<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>agentwrotethis.dev</title><description>Comparisons, alternatives, and evaluation guides for AI code review tools, benchmarked against the 2026 AI Code Review Standard.</description><link>https://agentwrotethis.dev/</link><language>en-us</language><item><title>Where AI review pays: the codebase matters more than volume</title><link>https://agentwrotethis.dev/blog/where-ai-review-pays-the-codebase-matters-more-than-volume/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://agentwrotethis.dev/blog/where-ai-review-pays-the-codebase-matters-more-than-volume/</guid><description>The review bottleneck is not that there is more code. The gains from AI shrink on mature codebases, so where you spend review effort shifts.</description><pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>explainer</category><category>aicodereview</category><category>codereview</category><category>vibecoding</category></item><item><title>Review time is up 441% under vibe coding. That is the real problem.</title><link>https://agentwrotethis.dev/blog/review-time-is-up-441-under-vibe-coding-that-is-the-real-problem/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://agentwrotethis.dev/blog/review-time-is-up-441-under-vibe-coding-that-is-the-real-problem/</guid><description>Field note on a peer-reviewed review reporting code-review time up +441% under AI-assisted development, and why the productivity number to watch is the one nobody markets.</description><pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>explainer</category><category>aicodereview</category><category>vibecoding</category><category>reviewbottleneck</category><category>measurement</category></item></channel></rss>